(urth) Weekly blog links

brunians at brunians.org brunians at brunians.org
Tue Apr 14 09:39:59 PDT 2009


By the way, as far as I know 'ouanquerre' is an alternate spelling of
wanker. Sort of like 'buncombe' (for bunkum). I certainly didn't invent
the word. Henry Mencken invented buncombe, maybe ouanquerre too.




.


> No doubt about Chomsky.
>
>
>
>
> .
>
>
>> To verify my intuition that this was some type of phonetic attempt at
>> "wanker," I searched and saw that someone on another forum calling
>> himself "brunians" applied this epithet to Chomsky, thus verifying
>> another intuition I had.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:17 AM,  <brunians at brunians.org> wrote:
>>> I think it was an appropriate question: unfortunately, after I wrote it
>>> I
>>> wrote another sentence, which you elide, wherein I wondered if Jon was
>>> a
>>> ouanquerre, which remark I regretted.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> .
>>>
>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 12:32 AM,  <brunians at brunians.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> Josh: So why don't you like the book, Jon? I understand from your
>>>>>>> article
>>>>>>> that you don't like it: that is abundantly obvious. But I think a
>>>>>>> review
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> this nature would be more useful if you would include a paragraph -
>>>>>>> even
>>>>>>> half a paragraph - where you give your reasons for not liking it.
>>>>
>>>>>> Jon: I thought I did in the post, but here it is again: I think the
>>>>>> book
>>>>>> (and several others) rely on the author's well-earned reputation for
>>>>>> subtlety to mask or adorn what are essentially undeveloped
>>>>>> pot-boilers. The time-travel aspect of Pirate Freedom illustrates
>>>>>> this
>>>>>> nicely, I think.
>>>>
>>>>> Josh: i want to apologize for my last remark, which I was very wrong
>>>>> to
>>>>> pass.
>>>>> You are entitled to your opinion, of course, I was at the tail end of
>>>>> a
>>>>> frazzled day.
>>>>> I don't agree with you about Pirate Freedom, but these couple of
>>>>> sentences
>>>>> do make more clear your problems with the book.  Again, my apologies.
>>>>
>>>> FWIW I think it was an appropriate question. It seems I'm not the only
>>>> one
>>>> who thought so.
>>>>
>>>> J.
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Urth Mailing List
>>>> To post, write urth at urth.net
>>>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Urth Mailing List
>>> To post, write urth at urth.net
>>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Urth Mailing List
>> To post, write urth at urth.net
>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>





More information about the Urth mailing list