(urth) Rajan vs Raja

[John Watkins]

Yes, it's possible that this subtlety escaped Wolfe.

On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 6:42 PM, James Wynn <crushtv at gmail.com> wrote:

> Well, I don't want you to back down,
>> I just don't remember a single instance of Raja
>> in the books.  Seems like if it was a valid conjugate,
>> it would appear at least once.
>>
>
> I don't mind backing down about stuff I don't care much about. In Sanskrit
> "Raja" is the nominative tense. Just because I'm technically accurate
> doesn't mean I'm *textually* accurate. I didn't imagine it would make a
> difference to anyone but me.
>
>
> J.
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.urth.net/pipermail/urth-urth.net/attachments/20090416/fff61895/attachment-0003.htm>