(urth) re silk is hot

[Marc Aramini]

I will stop after this since we risk getting far off topic and I think it is an irreconcilable difference of thought.

Let me just say the banker is deemed unqualified to define marriage by society already - his polyamory with banker and nonbanker alike has no chance of earning a tax sanction because the societal definition of marriage as a union of two with tax benefits is simply beyond his ability to change.  

His input is an illusion that can only fleetingly approach his true desires.

I assume everyone is ill suited to choose their government intil proven otherwise - most start with the opposite assumption and that is all there is too it.