(urth) Science catches up to the New Sun

brunians at brunians.org brunians at brunians.org
Fri Dec 12 16:40:13 PST 2008


It could be contracting now if time ran backwards....


.


> Of course, I'm far too much of a knucklehead to speak well about this
> theories potential veracity, but I've intuited this since I was a stoned
> 19 year old looking at Stephen Hawkings model where he has a big sphere
> with a big bang on one end and a big crunch on the other.  I thought, "NO
> NO NO, you' have to take either pole, bring them together in the middle
> until they are the same point. Then you've got the Donut or Bagel theory
> of the Universe, where the Big Bang is the Big Crunch, and the curves of
> the hole are event horizons.
>
> Then I saw this AMAZING lecture by Stan Tenen, called Geometric Metaphors
> for Life where he extracted the same basic theory out of a very strange
> reading of the Torah.  Anyone know Stan Tenen? Meru Foundation.  Very
> interesting stuff there.  Hard for me to follow. there are some overview
> videos on youtube.
>
>
> he's doing work with numbers and geometry, but it's not Kaballah, or
> Gematria.
> he comes up with geometric models exrapolated from the letters, which
> describe a Torus, the shadows of which can depict every hebrew letter, and
> further extrapolates these Apple and Seed models that speak to this notion
> of Re-Genesis.  Great stuff.  Give it a look. trust me, incredibly
> interesting stuff, potentially VERY important. Sort of a voice in the
> wilderness.
>
> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-208619888961779202&hl=en
>
>
>>I'm pretty sure this isn't the first time this theory has been bandied
>>about, but this sounds pretty much like the cosmology of the New Sun,
>> except
>>it's been posited as reality:
>>
>>
>>
>>Most cosmologists believe that our universe emerged from a singularity
>>during the Big Bang. But now physicists are exploring the possibility
>> that
>>our universe was created by the death of an earlier universe.
>>
>>Martin Bojowald and Abhat Ashtekar began researching their theory of loop
>>quantum cosmology (LQC), an approach to cosmology that combine's
>> Einstein's
>>theory of gravity with quantum mechanics. They have modeled the birth of
>> our
>>universe, exploring the mathematics of universe as it contracts back
>> toward
>>its point of origin.
>>
>>Bojowald's major realisation was that unlike general relativity, the
>> physics
>>of LQC did not break down at the big bang. Cosmologists dread the
>>singularity because at this point gravity becomes infinite, along with
>> the
>>temperature and density of the universe. As its equations cannot cope
>> with
>>such infinities, general relativity fails to describe what happens at the
>>big bang. Bojowald's work showed how to avoid the hated singularity,
>> albeit
>>mathematically. "I was very impressed by it," says Ashtekar, "and still
>> am."
>>
>>The researchers have found that when applying LQC, the universe does not
>>revert back to a singularity as it contracts. Instead of seeing a big
>> bang,
>>the models indicate that the universe experienced a big bounce, with a
>>predecessor universe contracting as it ended and then reemerging as our
>> new,
>>expanding universe. If the theory proves correct, it could mean that our
>>universe does not have a finite beginning and end but is, instead, part
>> of a
>>chain of universes that expand and then contract to give way to a brand
>> new
>>universe.
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>





More information about the Urth mailing list