(urth) House Absolute

[Matthew malthouse]

Son of Witz wrote:

> When I asked "are there rules to fiction now" I didn't frame my
> question right.
> what I meant to say is, Are we to presume Wolfe has worked this thing
> out perfectly so that there are no scientific implausibilities. It was
> in response to a statement like "There SHOULD be internal consistency".
> And of course, as the Mark Twain Rules would suggest, that there should
> be. 

You ommit the other part of what I said

    "...or a reason for the lack thereof."

Matthew