(urth) Defending Wolfe
aaronsingleton at gmail.com
Thu Aug 7 19:36:04 PDT 2008
Let this guy have his Terry Goodkind and John Ringo. Those of us who who
read higher than a sixth grade level will keep Wolfe for ourselves. ;)
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 9:59 PM, Lane Haygood <lhaygood at gmail.com> wrote:
> Some people don't like to think and read. I may not understand their
> alternative lifestyles, but it's not for me to judge.
> Sent from my iPhone
> On Aug 7, 2008, at 8:26 PM, "Blake Hyde" <syrion at gmail.com> wrote:
> He's a troll. Ignore him.
>> On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 1:42 AM, Fred Kiesche <recursive_loop at yahoo.com>
>>> A person commenting about a post on SF Signal has said (putting it nicer
>>> than he eventually does) that Wolfe is a bad writer. I've posted some
>>> comments, SF author John Wright has posted a comment...anybody from the
>>> want to join in and express an opinion?
>>> F.P. Kiesche III
>>> "Ah Mr. Gibbon, another damned, fat, square book. Always, scribble,
>>> scribble, scribble, eh?" (The Duke of Gloucester, on being presented with
>>> Volume 2 of The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire.) Blogging at
>>> Urth Mailing List
>>> To post, write urth at urth.net
>>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
>> Urth Mailing List
>> To post, write urth at urth.net
>> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
> Urth Mailing List
> To post, write urth at urth.net
> Subscription/information: http://www.urth.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Urth