(urth) The problem of Cthulhu

brunians at brunians.org brunians at brunians.org
Thu Jun 21 03:44:37 PDT 2007


>
> In a message dated 6/20/2007 11:26:46 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
> brunians at brunians.org writes:

> Remember  African Eve? Don't hear too much about her anymore.

> The reason you  don't is because after they presented their paper, someone
> went over their  evidence and pointed out that it was messed up: that it
> is true that they  could trace each sample to their posited African Eve,
> or they could work  the same sample a slightly different way and come up
> with other Eves, both  in and out of Africa.
>
>
> And subsequently someone went over the counterarguement and concluded that
> THAT analysis was wrong.  African Eve is alive and well, and so is a later
> African Adam.  Recent African Origin at the moment at least widely
> accepted  as being the best model for present human ancestry.

... by the people who accept it.

Then there's the others, that don't, that figure that group (A) is
screwing up somehow again.

And here we are.

Like I say: if your theory requires that humans not fuck, your theory is
wrong.




.






More information about the Urth mailing list