iorweththomas at hotmail.com
Tue Jul 4 06:46:29 PDT 2006
Hrrm. I assume that if one treats the mailing list as a set of secondary
sources, and then implements the no-editing template idea, then one could
just cite the relevant post, summarise its contents and perhaps use an
unalterable quote when needed. This might just make the wiki into a
navigatable index of the mailing list, but I'm not sure that that wouldn't
be a bad thing to have.
>From: "Roy C. Lackey" <rclackey at stic.net>
>Reply-To: The Urth Mailing List <urth at lists.urth.net>
>To: "Adam Stephanides" <adamsteph at earthlink.net>,"The Urth Mailing List"
><urth at lists.urth.net>
>Subject: Re: (urth) Wiki
>Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 16:27:42 -0500
>Adam S. wrote:
> >>As somebody who at one time did a fair amount of posting to the list,
>not thrilled with the idea of all my posts being thrust willy-nilly into
>public domain. I'm even less thrilled with the idea that anybody would be
>able to edit my posts. I doubt I'm the only one who feels this way.<<
>You got that right. My feelings, exactly.
>Urth Mailing List
>To post, write urth at urth.net
More information about the Urth