(urth) Christian relativity

don doggett kingwukong at yahoo.com
Tue Apr 11 15:20:26 PDT 2006



--- Dan'l Danehy-Oakes <danldo at gmail.com> wrote:

> On the other hand, I appreciate the physics neepery.
> Perhaps
> it can be marked with a different Subject: so people
> who don't
> want to read it can skip it without missing the rest
> of the
> discussion?

I doubt that's necessary. Information like that just
looks like big blocks of code to me anyway and my
brain just glides across it until something sticks.
Sometimes that something happens to be the delete
button. Other times I actually learn something. (dear
god no). I just think physics citations are hardly a
requirement for a valid literary argument. They're
more like cookies. Made of tofu. And Carob. A treat.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 



More information about the Urth mailing list