(urth) Very OT: Tories

[maru]

Oh.  Darn- I saw a little about that (columnists inveighing against the 
Human Rights Act or some such) but it never
ocurred to me that that was what you were referring to...

And actually, when I was there the weather was lovely.  Now, Paris' just 
sucked- rain practically every day.

~Maru

Iorwerth Thomas wrote:

> Actually, it was more the attempt to use a 'pseudo-Kantian' 
> categorical principle in order to enact oppressive laws on an ethnic 
> minority, i.e. the travelling comminity [1].
>
> But that'll do equally well.  And I can't quite remember its relevancy 
> to whatever point I was trying to make at the time anyhow.
>
> Hope you liked our lovely weather... :)
>
> Iorwerth
>
>
> [1]  Not that there isn't a problem; but this isn't the way to solve 
> it - and it's largely Howard's fault from when the Tories were in 
> charge anyhow.
>
>> From: maru <marudubshinki at gmail.com>
>
>
>> Incidentally Iowerth, reading the dailies and mags in Britain, I 
>> think I figured out what you were referring to;
>> you were referencing the Tories plans to, if they win the 2005 
>> general elections (req. since it has been whatever years
>> since the last, and nobody called an election voluntarily) and form a 
>> gov.'t etc, hold the line on increased public
>> spending at least a little. Right?
>
>